A teljhatalom igézete
  • Metaadatok
Tartalom: https://real.mtak.hu/235098/
Archívum: REAL
Gyűjtemény: Status = Published
Subject = B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion / filozófia, pszichológia, vallás: BL Religion / vallás
Subject = B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion / filozófia, pszichológia, vallás: BN2 Taoism / taoizmus
Subject = B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion / filozófia, pszichológia, vallás: B1 Philosophy (General) / filozófia általában
Type = Article
Cím:
A teljhatalom igézete
Létrehozó:
Várnai, András
Kiadó:
Pro Philosophia Alapítvány
Dátum:
2025
Téma:
B1 Philosophy (General) / filozófia általában
BL Religion / vallás
BN2 Taoism / taoizmus
Tartalmi leírás:
The second half of ancient China’s Zhou period (ca. 1050 BC – 221 BC) is a period when the task of ordering the “under of Heaven” (tianxia 天下) was added to the issues of the management of society struggle. The conceptual scheme that seems to be found in the fascinate of omnipotence is an ideological concept. The most important schools of Chinese philosophy focus on how power is exercised. Without exception, criticism of the actual exercise of power is given first place. What the Sinological literature calls Confucian moral philosophy is part of this technique of power, which is expressed in Kongzi’s Lunyu in the requirement of zhengming (正名 – “straight names”), very abstractly referring to the model of the old kings. The same is the case with the teaching of the Motists, in which Mozi wants to remedy the problems with the utopian theory of “extended care” (jian’ai 兼愛), instead of the established technique of power, emphasizing the pair of diagnosis and therapy as a measure of wise governance. The Confucian Mengzi’s arguments sharply criticize the activities of the rulers involved in the fictitious dialogue, combining the main ‘props’ of Kongzi’s teaching with advice on practical procedures. Xunzi, who is also a Confucian, offers the possibility of the reach of power regulation with a detailed presentation of the influence of zhengming. Her student, the legalist Han Feizi, with the role of “method” (shu 術), proposed a means of rigid enforcement of this regulation, the most obvious expression of the demand for omnipotent power.
Nyelv:
angol
Típus:
Article
PeerReviewed
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
Formátum:
text
Azonosító:
Várnai, András (2025) A teljhatalom igézete. KELLÉK : FILOZÓFIAI FOLYÓIRAT (74). pp. 7-30. ISSN 1453-7400
Kapcsolat:
10.61901/Kellek.2025.74.01
Létrehozó:
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess