Ugrás a tartalomhoz

Application of rights included in pillars of Aarhus Convention during the environmental impact assessment of the Paks II. investment
Az Aarhusi Egyezmény alappilléreit alkotó jogok érvényesülése a Paks II. beruházásra vonatkozó környezetvédelmi engedélyezés során

  • Metaadatok
Tartalom: https://ojs3.mtak.hu/index.php/JAEL/article/view/2464
Archívum: Agrár- és Környezetjog
Gyűjtemény: Cikkek
Cím:
Application of rights included in pillars of Aarhus Convention during the environmental impact assessment of the Paks II. investment
Az Aarhusi Egyezmény alappilléreit alkotó jogok érvényesülése a Paks II. beruházásra vonatkozó környezetvédelmi engedélyezés során
Létrehozó:
Kocsis, Bianka Enikő
Kiadó:
CEDR Magyar Agrárjogi Egyesület
Dátum:
2017-05-01
Téma:
Aarhus Convention
Paks II. investment
environmental licensing
Aarhus-i Egyezmény
Paks II. beruházás
környezetvédelmi engedélyezés
Tartalmi leírás:
In this study the author examines the procedure of environmental impact assessment related the investment from an aspect which may be different from the general. In the research the hypothesis is the following: rights concluded in the Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision-Making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters (which was adopted on 25 June 1998 in Aarhus) are ensured during the procedure. After examining the related theoretical basis and legal background, the author shows the procedure of the environmental impact assessment on Paks II. investment. However – in order to stay within the framework of the chosen topic – she focuses only those parts of that, which are relevant from the aspect of the Convention. For this reason questions examined in the study will be the followings: were the rights concluded in Aarhus Convention guaranteed during the Paks II. investment? If they were – how can it be verified? Did anybody raise objections or submit comments related the observation of certain rules of the Convention during the procedure? How did these objections and comments been handled? Did they have a real effect on decision-making?
In this study the author examines the procedure of environmental impact assessment related the investment from an aspect which may be different from the general. In the research the hypothesis is the following: rights concluded in the Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision-Making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters (which was adopted on 25 June 1998 in Aarhus) are ensured during the procedure. After examining the related theoretical basis and legal background, the author shows the procedure of the environmental impact assessment on Paks II. investment. However – in order to stay within the framework of the chosen topic – she focuses only those parts of that, which are relevant from the aspect of the Convention. For this reason questions examined in the study will be the followings: were the rights concluded in Aarhus Convention guaranteed during the Paks II. investment? If they were – how can it be verified? Did anybody raise objections or submit comments related the observation of certain rules of the Convention during the procedure? How did these objections and comments been handled? Did they have a real effect on decision-making?
Nyelv:
magyar
angol
Típus:
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Peer-reviewed Article
Formátum:
application/pdf
application/pdf
Azonosító:
Forrás:
Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Law; Vol. 12 No. 22 (2017); 77-101
Agrár- és Környezetjog; Évf. 12 szám 22 (2017); 77-101
1788-6171
Kapcsolat: