| Tartalom: |
http://pea.lib.pte.hu/handle/pea/7321 |
| Archívum: |
PEA |
| Gyűjtemény: |
Doktori disszertációk
ETK Egészségtudományi Doktori Iskola
|
| Cím: |
Limited Forensic Assessability of Soft Tissue Injuries. Contrastive Terminological Analyses of Hungarian, Austrian and German Medical Diagnostic Reports
Lágyrész-sérülések korlátozott igazságügyi megítélhet sége.
|
| Létrehozó: |
Fogarasi Katalin
|
| Közreműködő: |
Egészségtudományi Doktori Iskola
Dr. Bajnóczky István
Prof. emer. Csere Tibor
Prof. Dr. Figler Mária
Dr. Kereszty Éva
Dr. Keresztes Csilla
Dr. Rébék-Nagy Gábor
Dr. Riepert Thomas
Pécsi Tudományegyetem
|
| Dátum: |
2014-06-01T09:09:11Z
2014-06-01T09:09:11Z
2014-02-11
|
| Téma: |
Tudományterület::Orvostudományok - Medicine::Egészségtudományok - General health sciences
egészségtudomány
lingvisztika
lágyrész-sérülések
igazságügyi orvostan
terminológiai elemzés
health sciences
linguistic
soft tissue injuries
forensic medicine
terminological analyses
|
| Tartalmi leírás: |
The results of the present study confirm the hypothesis that MDRIs can be characterised by interdiscursivity, predominantly due to the inconsistent use of terms and the absence of
important features of soft tissue injuries in the three analysed countries. These factors can be attributed to the supposition that clinicians do not always seem to be aware of the fact that their medical findings might be used as legal evidence when a crime or forbearance is investigated. Another reason might be that they only concentrate on the acute treatment, which they often have to perform at night or under aggravated circumstances. There are neither standardised forms to fill in nor terms made available for physicians formulating findings on injuries. Consequently, it can hardly be expected that primary treating doctors should provide MDRIs which are perfectly applicable to forensic reconstruction.
178
ismeretlen
|
| Nyelv: |
angol
|
| Típus: |
PhD
|
| Azonosító: |
|
