Kereső
Bejelentkezés
Kapcsolat
|
|
'Salus rei publicae suprema lex esto?' : The use of classified data in immigration cases: analysis of the joined cases C- 420/22 and C- 528/22 NW and PQ |
| Tartalom: | https://real.mtak.hu/243786/ |
|---|---|
| Archívum: | REAL |
| Gyűjtemény: |
Status = Published
Subject = K Law / jog: K Law (General) / jogtudomány általában Subject = J Political Science / politológia: JV International migration / nemzetközi migráció Type = Article |
| Cím: |
'Salus rei publicae suprema lex esto?' : The use of classified data in immigration cases: analysis of the joined cases C- 420/22 and C- 528/22 NW and PQ
|
| Létrehozó: |
Gyeney, Laura
|
| Dátum: |
2025
|
| Téma: |
JV International migration / nemzetközi migráció
K Law (General) / jogtudomány általában
|
| Tartalmi leírás: |
This paper analyses the CJEU’s NW and PQ judgment by examining the core dilemma facing modern
states: balancing national security interests with individual freedoms. In this context, I will first examine
whether the right to an effective remedy, as guaranteed by Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights
of the European Union, requires that a third-country national whose residence permit has been withdrawn
on security grounds must at least be informed of the essence of the grounds on which the decision is based.
This question is particularly pressing given the wave of terrorist attacks over the last decades, which has
fundamentally undermined the fragile consensus on the operation of national security services under the
rule of law, reinforcing a ‘policy of prevention of terrorism and other national security threats’ (Bigo et al.
2015, 2). The study suggests that, regarding genuine national security concerns, it may be acceptable for an
individual not to have direct access to their entire file, consequently not knowing in detail why the
(specialist) authority considers them a threat. However, the court (or authority) must have the power to
review the merits of the justification for this classification. Moreover, this power must always be exercised
ex officio – since the very consequence of secrecy means that the person concerned is not in a legal position
to challenge or contest the authorities’ findings on the merits.
|
| Nyelv: |
angol
|
| Típus: |
Article
PeerReviewed
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
|
| Formátum: |
text
|
| Azonosító: |
Gyeney, Laura (2025) 'Salus rei publicae suprema lex esto?' : The use of classified data in immigration cases: analysis of the joined cases C- 420/22 and C- 528/22 NW and PQ. HUNGARIAN JOURNAL OF LEGAL STUDIES, 66 (2). pp. 113-130. ISSN 2498-5473
|
| Kapcsolat: |
MTMT:37284342 10.1556/2052.2025.00619
|
| Létrehozó: |
cc_by
|