A trianoni országhatárok kialakítása

Suba, János

2021

Trianon Peace Treaty

state border

Boundary Committee

delimitation

demarcation

metes and bounds

The operation of the committees whose task was to set the border can be divided into two phases. One of them was the ‚delimitation’, which means to establish and work on site the political borderline described in the peace treaty. The other was the ‚demarcation’, which was setting the border as a purely technical process. Points marked on the map had to be marked with real points on the spot, plus perpetuated by different border signs. After that the borderline could be measured, which actually means mapping the borderline and its surroundings in a particular lane. The activity and moving of the committees extended only to a narrow lane on both sides of the Trianon line, which showed that they were only prepared for local adjustment. The borderlines were divided into sections in order to share the setting, measuring and financial burden. The setting of the borderline was proceeded only slowly and in more phases in most of the sections as the committee was voting. Nevertheless, by the end of 1922 it was completed, except some minor parts. After that each border point was perpetuated with different border signs according to their importance. The mapping of the borderline was executed in a given lane. After signing the border documents the committees were broken up as their task was finally carried out. Nevertheless, in some places there were small rectifications, partly by the decision of the committees, partly due to referenda, is one case the League of Nations expressed the last word.

magyar

info:eu-repo/semantics/article

application/pdf

http://hdl.handle.net/10831/104205

https://doi.org/10.26888/GEOMET.2021.5.1.1

elte:1

elte:GeoMetodika

elte:24

elte:7

elte:5

LOMS: https://edit.elte.hu/xmlui/bitstream/10831/104205/1/GM_11_tanulmany1.pdf

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess