A felsebzett szubjektum
A felsebzett szubjektum
  • Metaadatok
Tartalom: https://ojs.lib.unideb.hu/studia/article/view/3943
Archívum: Studia Litteraria
Gyűjtemény: Tanulmányok
Open Access DRIVERset
Cím:
A felsebzett szubjektum
A felsebzett szubjektum
Létrehozó:
Kalmár, György
Kiadó:
Debreceni Egyetemi Kiadó
Dátum:
2011-01-01
Tartalmi leírás:
The article analyses David Cronenberg’s Crash (1996) from a complex theoretical perspective. My starting point is the idea that human subjectivity is open, never finished, in process, something that is always negotiated through a number of signifying practices, such as language, images, and film; therefore different signifying economies produce different kinds of subjectivities. In this article I investigate the ways Crash rewrites some of the fundamental characteristics of humanistic systems of meaning to produce different subjects. I argue that the film produces a post-human world in which meaning is different, the use of the body is different, the forms of subjectivity are different, just like their relation to what Lacan calls the ‘paternal metaphor.’ I think that Crash owes its radicalism (as well as its scandalous reputation) to this displacement of the humanist subject, and it is precisely this displacement that I attempt to investigate. The main focus points of my analysis are the following: the relationship between the body, its image, and subjectivity; non-normative practices of sexuality; violence; repetition; abjection; the relationship between technology and the human body; and the disintegration of the Oedipal subject.
The article analyses David Cronenberg’s Crash (1996) from a complex theoretical perspective. My starting point is the idea that human subjectivity is open, never finished, in process, something that is always negotiated through a number of signifying practices, such as language, images, and film; therefore different signifying economies produce different kinds of subjectivities. In this article I investigate the ways Crash rewrites some of the fundamental characteristics of humanistic systems of meaning to produce different subjects. I argue that the film produces a post-human world in which meaning is different, the use of the body is different, the forms of subjectivity are different, just like their relation to what Lacan calls the ‘paternal metaphor.’ I think that Crash owes its radicalism (as well as its scandalous reputation) to this displacement of the humanist subject, and it is precisely this displacement that I attempt to investigate. The main focus points of my analysis are the following: the relationship between the body, its image, and subjectivity; non-normative practices of sexuality; violence; repetition; abjection; the relationship between technology and the human body; and the disintegration of the Oedipal subject.
Nyelv:
magyar
Típus:
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Formátum:
application/pdf
Azonosító:
10.37415/studia/2011/1–2/72–87.
Forrás:
Studia Litteraria; Vol 49 No 1–2 (2011): Testinterpretációk; 72–87.
Studia Litteraria; Évf. 49 szám 1–2 (2011): Testinterpretációk; 72–87.
2063-1049
0562-2867
Kapcsolat:
Létrehozó:
Copyright (c) 2011 Studia Litteraria