Kereső
Bejelentkezés
Kapcsolat
![]() |
The Inverse Agreement Constraint in Uralic Languages |
Tartalom: | http://full.btk.ppke.hu/index.php/FULL/article/view/12 |
---|---|
Archívum: | FULL |
Gyűjtemény: | Articles |
Cím: |
The Inverse Agreement Constraint in Uralic Languages
|
Létrehozó: |
É. Kiss, Katalin; Research Institute for Linguistics, Hungarian Academy of Sciences and Pázmány University
|
Kiadó: |
Pázmány Péter Catholic University
|
Dátum: |
2013-08-25
|
Tartalmi leírás: |
The paper aims to answer the question why object–verb agreement is blocked in Hungarian, Tundra Nenets, Selkup, and Nganasan if the object is a first or second person pronoun. Based on Dalrymple & Nikolaeva (2011), it is argued that object–verb agreement serves (or served historically) to mark the secondary topic status of the object. The gaps in object-verb agreement can be derived from the Inverse Agreement Constraint, a formal, semantically unmotivated constraint observed by Comrie (1980) in Chukchee, Koryak and Kamchadal, forbidding object-verb agreement if the object is more ʻanimate’ than the subject: The paper claims that the Inverse Agreement Constraint is a constrainton information structure. What it requires is that a secondary topic be less topical than the primary topic. An object more topical than the primary topic can only figure as a focus. A version of the constraint can also explain why Hungarian first and second person objects have no accusative suffix, and why accusative marking is optional in the case of objects having a first or second person possessor.
|
Nyelv: |
angol
|
Típus: |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Peer-reviewed Article
|
Formátum: |
application/pdf
|
Azonosító: | |
Forrás: |
Finno-Ugric Languages and Linguistics; Vol 2, No 1 (2013)
2063-8825
|
Kapcsolat: |