Round about the verge: Central Europe

Keretszélen körös-körül: Közép-Európa

Halmos, Károly

Centre for Economic and Regional Studies, Hungarian Academy of Sciences

1990-06-01

Historians—little proudly—usually deflne Central Europe as a geographical dimension or history. The story is that of the West and it is about how the West has become the centre—not to say the middle—of the world. Given a historical region, it obviously has got a name. But it is not so sure that there is a civilization deposit, an all-overrunning and settled silt beneath the conceptual structures—which change over time—making up this name.Is there such a contiguous area or does such an area exist contiguously that we call Central Europe? The map on which we would draw the borders of Central Europe, upon request— allowing prudent people to hatchure a belt—, is a product unified by the science of centuries. An issueless map. If you read the instructions—learn to read the map—you can orientate on it. But our inner map of the surrounding world is different: based on the possibility of different mental maps, the paper suggests one in which distances are measured by ton-miles costs. The shape of the world in this map becomes similar to the one of Hekataios. The topology and geometry of this map are, however, non-Euclidian and discontinuous. Prior to railways, tree-shaped fluvial systems introduced a natural hierarchy or order among the points of space but railways—though often running along rivers—upset this natural arrangement. A developed i.e. dense road or rail network shrinks areas while the impact of a scarce one is similar to that of a caught thread in stockings: the whole netting would not get shrunk or „felted", only the thus far smooth „surface" would get disturbed along the wrested thread. Interdependent regions would increasingly fall into micro-regions, drifting extremes closer to each other, creating inequalities even within relatively small areas—like when you flash past a bidonville along the highway.The aim of the present paper is twofold:It was intended to highlight the fact that a regional view pre-suggests some kind of dominant unity, therefore the answer lies, from many aspects, in accepting the question.It was intended to contribute to making previous questions trivial and previous trivialities questionable by suggesting a map which is different from the usual one.As for the author, he would be contended if Central Europe were not only a „historical concept" but also „constructed by history".

text/html

application/pdf

http://tet.rkk.hu/index.php/TeT/article/view/175

10.17649/TET.4.2.175

Tér és Társadalom; Évf. 4, Szám 2 (1990); 87–96.

Tér és Társadalom; Évf. 4, Szám 2 (1990); 87–96.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms: Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work 3 months after publication simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

A folyóiratban publikálni kívánó szerzők elfogadják a következő feltételeket: A szerzők megtartják a szerzői jogokat, de a folyóiratnak adják az első közlés jogát. A megjelenés után három hónappal a tanulmány a Creative Commons Nevezd meg! - Ne add el! -Ne változtasd! 3.0 licensz alá kerül, amely mások számára lehetővé teszi, hogy a cikket módosítás nélkül, a szerzők és az első megjelenés helyének feltüntetésével nem kereskedelmi céllal szabadon felhasználják.A szerzők jogosultak további szerződéseket kötni az itt megjelent tanulmány más helyen történő, nem kizárólagos terjesztéséről (pl. könyvben való megjelenés), amennyiben az eredeti megjelenés helyét feltüntetik.